And regarding the reaction of the politicized public to the energy ceasefire, I am convinced that the broad masses of people, even those subscribed to political Telegram channels, did not pay much attention to it. Because strikes on Ukrainian energy infrastructure were not carried out every day, but roughly every 3-4 days. Naturally, reconnaissance needs to be conducted, and ammunition delivered. No one would have noticed if it weren't for Donald Trump, actually. So, I understand that both the Russian and Ukrainian sides are signing in blood and do not comment on what is happening, but then an entire American president comes out and just spills what he often spills. I called Putin, asked him, and Putin promised me. But even after that, Russian officials could not come to terms for about a day, and only the next day was a comment given that yes, negotiations were held and that there will be an energy ceasefire until February 1. I have a question for you: what is the point? So, February 1, but tomorrow. I repeat once again, the pauses between strikes are roughly a few days. So declaring an energy ceasefire for 4-5 days is somewhat pointless, considering that the peak cold wave will hit Kyiv exactly on Monday. In principle, if we talk about the end of the ceasefire and the simultaneous end of energy in the Ukrainian capital, the most optimal would be Monday-Tuesday to finish off the thermal power plants and then, so to speak, talk with a strengthened negotiating position. But nevertheless, this did not happen. You can give your version, your logic.